<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HRO'C Blog &#187; Search Marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hroc.co.uk/blog/index.php/category/digital/search-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hroc.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>HRO'C is a full-service marketing agency based in Edgbaston, Birmingham</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Twitters Traffic Generation</title>
		<link>http://www.hroc.co.uk/blog/index.php/17-08-2009/twitters-traffic-generation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hroc.co.uk/blog/index.php/17-08-2009/twitters-traffic-generation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hitwise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robin goad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hroc.co.uk/blog/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As with any new ‘channel’ talk soon turns to how to make money from it, and Twitter is no different. Hitwise’s research director, Robin Goad, blogs on some interesting Twitter numbers here:
Twitter sending traffic to online media but not retail.

A couple of stand out paragraphs:
&#8220;One consequence of its phenomenal growth is that Twitter has become [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with any new ‘channel’ talk soon turns to how to make money from it, and Twitter is no different. Hitwise’s research director, Robin Goad, blogs on some interesting Twitter numbers here:</p>
<p><a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/robin-goad/2009/06/twitter_sending_traffic_to_online_media_but_not_retail.html" target="_blank">Twitter sending traffic to online media but not retail</a>.<br />
<span id="more-114"></span><br />
A couple of stand out paragraphs:</p>
<p><cite>&ldquo;One consequence of its phenomenal growth is that Twitter has become a key source of traffic to other websites. During May 2009 Twitter was the 30th biggest source of traffic for other sites in the UK, accounting for 1 in every 350 visits to a typical website. Over half of this traffic (55.9%) is sent to other content-driven online media sites, such as social networks, blogs, and news and entertainment websites. However, only 9.5% of Twitter’s downstream traffic is sent to transactional websites (i.e. travel, business and finance sites, plus online retailers). By contrast, Google UK (the country’s biggest search engine and source of traffic to other websites) sends 30.7% of its traffic to transactional sites, while for Facebook (the UK’s most popular social network), the figure is 14.7%.&rdquo;</cite></p>
<p><cite>&ldquo;The key to having a successful Twitter presence is to engage the community. Twitter is a great viral marketing channel, and for many users the aim is to have their story ‘retweeted’ – i.e. passed on by other users – as many times as possible. Although all of the newspapers have multiple ‘official’ feeds, these tend to be bland and have very low ‘retweet’ rates. Where journalists themselves are ‘tweeting’ themselves and engaging with the Twitter community, they typically have more success in creating viral stories.&rdquo;</cite></p>
<p>It’s like any channel, make the experience engaging and genuinely worthwhile and you will see the rewards&hellip; And if you aren’t really sure why you’re using a channel like Twitter, then don’t expect your audience to work it out for you&hellip;<br />
<h3>Related posts</h3>
<ul class="menu related_post">
<li><a href="http://www.hroc.co.uk/blog/index.php/17-08-2009/the-sheriff-and-his-deputy-are-back-in-town/" title="The Sheriff and his Deputy are back in town">The Sheriff and his Deputy are back in town</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hroc.co.uk/blog/index.php/28-05-2009/its-tweeting-darling/" title="It&#8217;s Tweeting darling!">It&#8217;s Tweeting darling!</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hroc.co.uk/blog/index.php/11-04-2009/hroc-blog/" title="HRO’C Blog">HRO’C Blog</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hroc.co.uk/blog/index.php/17-08-2009/twitters-traffic-generation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bing was Live &amp; Live was Dead</title>
		<link>http://www.hroc.co.uk/blog/index.php/09-06-2009/bing-was-live-live-was-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hroc.co.uk/blog/index.php/09-06-2009/bing-was-live-live-was-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Shergold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rebranding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hroc.co.uk/blog/?p=99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Within the search industry, talk is always turning to the fate of MSN and Yahoo in the search engine wars that are dominated by the heavyweight champion of search: Google. Recent attention has focused on MSN with its many management changes and developments, and, in particular, on its newly branded search engine called Bing.

On 3rd [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.hroc.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bing-1.jpg" alt="" width="553" height="250" /><br />
Within the search industry, talk is always turning to the fate of MSN and Yahoo in the search engine wars that are dominated by the heavyweight champion of search: Google. Recent attention has focused on MSN with its many management changes and developments, and, in particular, on its newly branded search engine called Bing.<br />
<span id="more-99"></span><br />
On 3rd June Bing was live and all users redirected from MSN’s previous reinvention of the wheel <a href="http://www.live.co.uk" title="MSN Live">www.live.co.uk</a> to Bing. So, like the rest of the industry, I have been keen to see what changes MSN has added to the newly branded search engine.  The answer is: very little. On the surface you are greeted with a nice picture and generally the same feel as you would get from Live. What’s more, the search results are formatted the same as they were on MSN &#038; Live. So, at this stage, I am a bit puzzled about the reinvention.</p>
<p>Following any new update from the search engine giants, I am always keen to see if there will be any impact on my clients and their search strategies. Recent Google additions, for instance, tend to be pushing hardworking SEO rankings down under maps, products and videos!! After a few searches, I did come across two interesting things.</p>
<h2>The One and Only Argos!</h2>
<p>Upon searching for Argos, I found that Argos itself was the ONLY advertisement showing. Hopefully, this is just a teething error. When I searched for other big online stores I found the usual lengthy listings. Hopefully this is not part of some bigger plan, otherwise I can here the cries of despair from the Argos affiliates now.<br />
<img src="http://www.hroc.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bing-2.jpg" alt="" width="553" height="261" /></p>
<h2>Follow the Yellow Dot</h2>
<p>The other addition I found to the listing is a little feature that allows you to see information about the page within the listing. Next to each natural search listing, if you hover over the advert, you see a yellow dot appear. Hover over this dot and it gives you a snippet of information. Is this any use and will people find it? Personally, I don’t see how this will help users choose which listing to click on. Initially it appeared and I could not see how it happened; it took me a few minutes to track down the link again. Case for more effective usability, I think.<br />
<img src="http://www.hroc.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bing-3.jpg" alt="" width="553" height="250" /><br />
To me, Bing just looks like the same old shoes, but with a bit of a polish; it’s certainly one thing I will be keeping an eye on to see what Microsoft has in mind. Personally, I want to see them go after Google and really try to be innovative, but I remember when Microsoft released adcenter and how bad the interface was initially. 2 years on, many of the same issues still exist.</p>
<h3>Related posts</h3>
<ul class="menu related_post">
<li>No Related Post</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hroc.co.uk/blog/index.php/09-06-2009/bing-was-live-live-was-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
